76 research outputs found
Multimodal One-Shot Learning of Speech and Images
Imagine a robot is shown new concepts visually together with spoken tags,
e.g. "milk", "eggs", "butter". After seeing one paired audio-visual example per
class, it is shown a new set of unseen instances of these objects, and asked to
pick the "milk". Without receiving any hard labels, could it learn to match the
new continuous speech input to the correct visual instance? Although unimodal
one-shot learning has been studied, where one labelled example in a single
modality is given per class, this example motivates multimodal one-shot
learning. Our main contribution is to formally define this task, and to propose
several baseline and advanced models. We use a dataset of paired spoken and
visual digits to specifically investigate recent advances in Siamese
convolutional neural networks. Our best Siamese model achieves twice the
accuracy of a nearest neighbour model using pixel-distance over images and
dynamic time warping over speech in 11-way cross-modal matching.Comment: 5 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables; accepted to ICASSP 201
Visually grounded learning of keyword prediction from untranscribed speech
During language acquisition, infants have the benefit of visual cues to
ground spoken language. Robots similarly have access to audio and visual
sensors. Recent work has shown that images and spoken captions can be mapped
into a meaningful common space, allowing images to be retrieved using speech
and vice versa. In this setting of images paired with untranscribed spoken
captions, we consider whether computer vision systems can be used to obtain
textual labels for the speech. Concretely, we use an image-to-words multi-label
visual classifier to tag images with soft textual labels, and then train a
neural network to map from the speech to these soft targets. We show that the
resulting speech system is able to predict which words occur in an
utterance---acting as a spoken bag-of-words classifier---without seeing any
parallel speech and text. We find that the model often confuses semantically
related words, e.g. "man" and "person", making it even more effective as a
semantic keyword spotter.Comment: 5 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables; small updates, added link to code;
accepted to Interspeech 201
- …